Friday, March 29, 2024
Friday, March 29, 2024
Get the Daily
Briefing by Email

Subscribe

NUCLEAR IRAN & PALESTINIAN TERROR: CHALLENGES ISRAEL WILL OVERCOME

We welcome your comments to this and any other CIJR publication. Please address your response to:  Rob Coles, Publications Chairman, Canadian Institute for Jewish Research, PO Box 175, Station  H, Montreal QC H3G 2K7 

 

Contents:

 

The Vitality of Anger: David M. Weinberg, Israel Hayom, Nov. 21, 2014— A grotesque kind of quiet has taken root among Israelis in the Promised Land; a morose passivity that expresses depression and suggests acquiescence.

In This Struggle, Israel Can Prevail: Dr. Mordechai Kedar, Arutz Sheva, Nov. 20, 2014— During these difficult days of increasing terror, the most urgent question is: What can we do in order to cope optimally with the growing terrorist violence in Israel, knowing that behind the scenes there are several players who are expending intense efforts to bring about an explosion.

The Silence of the Dhimmis: Camera, Nov. 20, 2014 — The November 18th murder of five people at Kehilat Yaakov Synagogue in Jerusalem has shocked the world.

Iran's no China: Caroline Glick, Jerusalem Post, Nov. 24, 2014— The Obama administration will never abandon its courtship of Iran.

 

On Topic Links

 

Sunni Political Islam: Engine of ‘Israeli-Palestinian’ Conflict: Jonathan Spyer, PJ Media, Nov. 22, 2014

Battle of Jerusalem: What Congress Should Do Now: Seth Lipsky, New York Post, Nov. 19, 2014

What To Do About Car Terrorism: Stephen M. Flatow, Jewish Press, Nov. 13, 2014

The Accomplishment of Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, A Soldier of Allah: Paul Merkley, Bayview Review, Nov. 18, 2014

The Temple Mount and Global Jihad: Ruthie Blum, Jerusalem Post, Nov. 9, 2014

                                      

                                          

THE VITALITY OF ANGER                                                                                       

David M. Weinberg                                                                                             

Israel Hayom, Nov. 21, 2014

 

A grotesque kind of quiet has taken root among Israelis in the Promised Land; a morose passivity that expresses depression and suggests acquiescence. It stems from the feeling that little can be done about "the situation." It comes from the paralyzing conclusion that there are no easy solutions in our war with the Palestinians. And you have to wonder: When will we learn, finally, to harness the vitality of anger — anger that has built-up inside of us all — instead of wallowing in woe?

 

It is almost as if Israelis have been lulled into a stupor by the intractable nature of the conflict. No matter how hard the gangs incited by Mahmoud Abbas hit us, we fail to rise up in appropriate rage and demand that our government take even harsher action to shut up Abbas and shut down the terrorist cells in eastern Jerusalem. No matter how many times Palestinians violate their treaty obligations, Israelis, it seems, just settle back into the living room armchair to sigh and cluck in sadness. No matter how horrific the latest terrorist outrage, we are wont to sorrowfully cry with the widows and orphans on TV, or mournfully mutter "how terrible it is" around the coffee-maker at work. To release some bottled-up bitterness, someone will make a sarcastic remark about feeble Israeli leadership or crack some black humor about the situation. How weak and how sad.

 

Immediately upon discovering the next Palestinian transgression, Public Security Minister Yitzhak Aharonovitch will comically convene "urgent consultations," from which he will emerge hours later to inform us that "the police are beefing up their presence in Jerusalem"; or that "we will respond at the time and place of our choosing"; or perhaps that he has ordered concrete blocks be placed at strategic train stops in Jerusalem to defend pedestrians. Benjamin Netanyahu will emerge from the Prime Minister's Office with a grim face to tell us for the umpteenth-thousandth time that he views "this dangerous escalation with the utmost gravity" and to rhetorically slam Abbas. Justice Minister Tzipi Livni will pontificate something about the need for "calm" and suggest that we need to give the Palestinians a "horizon." Undoubtedly, these pronouncements have Islamic Movement leader Raed Salah, Abbas and the gangs of Jabel Mukaber shaking in their boots.

 

And the people of Israel? We cluck and groan and murmur our discontent, and then get on with our daily business as best we can. Because we have no choice, right? I ask: What has happened to our determination and sense of national responsibility? Where are all the activists, the taxi drivers, the pioneers, the suffering victims, and all those who sympathize with them? Even after the Begin Center, Shuafat, Sheikh Jarrah and Wadi Joz assaults, the slaughter of Jews in the synagogue in Har Nof, and recent Tel Aviv terrorist attacks too — are we too afraid or tired or too downcast to take to the streets and demand real action from our government? It is almost as if we are embarrassed to demonstrate; ashamed to let the blood get to our heads and make us truly angry. Anger, writes Maimonides, is a treacherous emotion to be avoided in most situations, as is hate (Mishneh Torah, The Book of Knowledge 2:3). Except when faced with evil. Then, anger is the appropriate, necessary, energizing, response. It is a mitzvah to hate those who seek to undermine the morality of society or to destroy the nation.

 

Does anyone have any doubt that the Palestinian regime established alongside us over the past 20 years is malignant? That the PA-controlled Wakf on the Temple Mount is fomenting violence? And if so, are we forever going to sit back and sigh? I truly believe that the vast majority of eastern Jerusalem Arabs abhor the violence. They value their Israeli-provided freedom of expression and mobility, their Israeli jobs, medical care and social welfare benefits; and they would welcome an Israeli military reconquest of their streets. They really would. Thus the neutralization of Abbas' influence in Jerusalem and the crushing of radical elements in eastern Jerusalem are not impossible. I'm certain the Shin Bet, Israel Police and IDF can do the job if given the order and the resources to do so. But this requires national will; it requires a government with that is not wrought by rivalries and frozen in place; a government that is not paralyzed by over-attentiveness to foreign criticism. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis marching in the streets to say "enough!" might supply our government with the necessary spine. Otherwise, our inaction and apparent indifference could yet be mistaken by enemies without and within as resignation and acceptance of the situation. They will continue running to huddle and hug Abbas, to lobby against our national interests abroad, and to broadcast their corrosive messages on national radio and TV.

 

Two thousand years after the destruction of the Second Jewish Commonwealth and only one generation after the Holocaust, the Jewish people have returned to Zion to reclaim their homeland, through much sweat and sacrifice. Despite a few post-Zionist intellectuals and a defeatist press, Zionist grit and patriotic determination to overcome all challenges is alive and well among large majorities of Israel's varied sub-societies. Doing what is needed to improve our personal and national security does not require any apologies. We ought not weakly whimper away. It is essential that we take to the streets. It is time to angrily shake the trees and rustle up the troops. The Netanyahu government should feel much more manifestly that it has the overwhelming backing of Israelis for decisive, seismological action against radical actors in Palestinian society and the Israeli Arab community.         

 

                                                                       

Contents    

                                                                                                                                       

IN THIS STRUGGLE, ISRAEL CAN PREVAIL

Dr. Mordechai Kedar                                           

Arutz Sheva, Nov. 20, 2014

 

During these difficult days of increasing terror, the most urgent question is: What can we do in order to cope optimally with the growing terrorist violence in Israel, knowing that behind the scenes there are several players who are expending intense efforts to bring about an explosion. Leading the pack is Hamas, whose goal is to become the undisputed leader of the Palestinian Arabs at the expense of the Palestinian Authority – and, for good measure, giving Sisi something to remember. Supporting Hamas is a coalition composed of Qatar and Turkey, with unlimited sources of funds.

 

The PLO, at the same time, is trying to hold on to first place and cannot allow itself to appear less extreme than Hamas, for fear it will be accused of cooperating with Israel. This is the origin of the two-faced behavior of the PA: on the one hand, it presents a cooperative face to Israel and on the other hand, it stabs Israel in the back, through incitement and education, on the street and in international forums. Qatar bases its standing in the Arab world and the West by pouring oil on the fire, exactly as it does with Islamic State. Hypocritically, in the usual Qatari fashion, it funds Islamic state while, as part of the Western coalition, it expresses support for those who fight it. Behind the scenes of the growing terror Israel faces stands Islamic State, the model for successful battles against the enemies of Islam: massacre the enemy, act with extreme violence and use fast vehicles that give the impression of Jihad's sweeping, advancing victory. The murderers who entered the Jerusalem Synagogue did not bring long butcher's cleavers for nothing.

 

The answer: The time for politically correct euphemisms is over and the unpleasant truth must be told as it is. First of all, Israel must say emphatically: the Palestinian Authority established on the basis of the Oslo Accords is an enemy entity, an enemy whose goal is establishing an Arab state  in place of Israel, not alongside Israel, but on its ruins. That is the reason the Oslo Accords were violated so blatantly and thoroughly by the other side, resulting in them being declared null and void.. In addition, Israel must cease funding the PA on the basis of economic agreements derived from the Oslo Accords. There is no other country that funds an enemy entity, and there is no reason for Israel to be the only country that acts in such a delusional manner. The government of Israel must condemn those among us who were instrumental in giving us the "New Middle East", even those who once held posts of high honor.

 

2. Israel must announce as clearly as possible that Jerusalem is not a subject in any negotiations with anyone. It was never the capital of any entity connected to the Arab or Islamic world and was never ruled by a king, sultan, emir or caliph, so that there is no historical or legal basis for demanding that it be the capital of any state other than Israel. 3. Israel has to remind the entire world that Judea, Samaria and Eastern Jerusalem were areas occupied by Jordan for 19 years, from May 1948 until June 1967. Had the Arab world felt it was just and necessary, it could have established a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital then, without anyone in the world disputing it.  The Arabs  refrained from doing that for the 7000 days in which Jordan had control of the area and therefore have no right to demand from Israel what they did not demand from themselves. 5. Israel must immediately shut down all the PA institutions in Jerusalem and any governmental entity that is not that of the state of Israel. Sovereignty cannot be shared or compromised on, because he who compromises with regard to his sovereignty loses it. 6.The police must issue a restraining order against all Islamic Movement activists, first and foremost to Sheikh Raad Salah and his deputy Sheikh Kamal el Khatib.  After that, the possibility of issuing an order forbidding them to leave Um El Fahem and Kafr Kana should be considered. 7. Israel must immediately shut down all the Hamas TV stations broadcasting in Judea and Samaria. 8. Israel must keep the bodies of all dead terrorists who committed terror attacks. To all events, Israel must forbid their burial in Jerusalem, especially not in the vicinity of the Temple Mount, because burial in that spot is an expression of pride in the shahid and  encourages more terror…[To Read the Full Article Click the Following Link—Ed.]

                                                                       

Contents            

                                                                                                  

                                     

THE SILENCE OF THE DHIMMIS                                                       

Camera, Nov. 20, 2014

                                               

The November 18th murder of five people at Kehilat Yaakov Synagogue in Jerusalem has shocked the world. Two Palestinian men turned a house of prayer into a killing zone. One group that has remained remarkably silent about the massacre is Christian leaders in Bethlehem, where the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference takes place every even-numbered year under the auspices of Bethlehem Bible College (BethBC). Christian leaders associated with CATC and BethBC have offered nary a word of criticism of the attack, nor have they condemned Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for the inflammatory remarks he has made prior to the attack. He has referred to Jews who want to visit the Temple Mount as "a herd of cattle," accused them as "contaminating" the Al Aksa Mosque and declared they must be prevented from entering the site "by any means."

 

Palestinian Christians who routinely (and falsely) condemn Israel for denying Christians access to holy sites in Jerusalem have remained virtually silent about these remarks. And they have not offered a word of condemnation for incitement against "'the rabbis' of the secret societies," that was published in an official PA newspaper a week before the attack. With their silence, these Christians have demonstrated once again that they are not really the “peacemakers” they claim to be, but are merely propagandists who use the language of peace to condemn Israel and encourage their allies in the West to gloss over the sins of the Palestinians.

 

They are part of the machinery of cognitive warfare that has been built piece-by-piece, year-by-year – over the past several decades – to destroy the reputation of the Jewish state and undermine its ability to defend itself both physically and ideologically. When Westerners speak of Palestinian "civil society," what they are referring to — without meaning to — is this apparatus of cognitive warfare. Palestinian intellectuals, politicians, journalists and religious leaders (including Christians), have helped keep Palestinians on a war-footing with the Jewish state for the past several decades. All too often, they speak in terms that justify Palestinian violence against Israelis. For example, at the 2012 Christ at the Checkpoint Conference, one of the speakers was Bethlehem Mayor Victor Batarseh, a former member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – the organization which, according to The New York Times, took “credit” for the November 18 attack. It was also responsible for the murder of Leon Klinghoffer. During his talk, Batarseh said Israel was “crucifying” the Palestinians, spoke of Bethlehem being a giant prison and said that Jesus Christ was, in the form of the Palestinian people, imprisoned by the security barrier.

 

Statements like these are clearly intended to incite Christian animosity toward the Jewish state. (Apparently, you can take the mayor out of the PFLP, but you can't take the PFLP out of the mayor.) The PFLP, which was founded by a Palestinian Christian (and terrorist) by the name of George Habash, enjoys a vaunted place in the imagination of Christians in Bethlehem. In September 2007, the Holy Land Trust, founded and led by Sami Awad, held a protest in honor of Abu Ali Mustafa, who served as secretary General of the PFLP prior to his death in 2006. Judging from this 2000 interview, Mustafa was clearly a supporter of violence against Israel, even as other Palestinian organizations were negotiating with Israel. Why did Sami Awad, a so-called peacemaker who is heavily involved with the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference, allow his organization, Holy Land Trust, to commemorate the death of an avowed terrorist who in 2000 was calling for violence against Israel when other Palestinian factions were negotiating with Israel? Is this an appropriate action for a so-called peacemaking organization to be doing? This question takes on increased urgency when we learn that Awad has called Khader Ahdnan, a member of Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a “national hero.”

 

Unfortunately, the people who help broadcast the Palestinian Christian narrative in the United States and Europe are reluctant to raise these issues. In his 2012 movie, With God on Our Side, filmmaker Porter Speakman presented Palestinian Christians as unalloyed forces for peace in the Holy Land. For example, he portrayed Saleem Munayeer, who at one time bragged of his connections to PFLP founder George Habash, as someone who can point a way to peace between Jew and Arab. This might alarm people who are knowledgeable about Habash's life story.

 

The sad reality is this: Christians in Palestinian society are not the unalloyed force for good they are portrayed as by their allies in the West. Some Christians, like George Habash, engage in acts of violence against Israel. Others, like Victor Batarseh, justify it with falsehoods. And others, like Sami Awad and those associated with the Bethlehem Bible College's Christ at the Checkpoint movement, condemn Israel every chance they get, but keep their mouths shut when their countrymen do unspeakable things. If Palestinian Christians cannot speak the truth about their own society at a time such as this, there is every reason to question their testimony about the Jewish state.

                                   

                                                                       

Contents                   

                                                                                                                                          

IRAN'S NO CHINA                                                                                                    

Caroline Glick                                                                                                                  

Jerusalem Post, Nov. 24, 2014

 

The Obama administration will never abandon its courtship of Iran. On the eve of the extended deadline in the US-led six-party talks with Iran regarding Teheran’s illicit nuclear weapons program, the one thing that is absolutely clear is that courting Iran is the centerpiece of US President Barack Obama’s Middle East policy. Come what may in Geneva, this will not change. To be clear, Obama does not seek to check Iran’s rise to regional hegemony by appeasing it. None of the actions he has taken to date with regard to Iran can be construed as efforts to check or contain Iran.

Their goal is to cultivate a US alliance with Iran. As Obama sees things, Iran for him is what China was for then US president Richard Nixon. Nixon didn’t normalize US relations with the People’s Republic of China in order to harm the Chinese Communists. And Obama isn’t wooing Iran’s Islamic revolutionaries in order to harm them. Unfortunately for the world, China is not a relevant analogy for Iran. Nixon sought to develop ties with Beijing because he wanted to pry the Chinese out of the Soviet orbit. Courting China meant harming Moscow, and Moscow as the US’s greatest foe. There is no Moscow that will be weakened by the US’s empowerment of Tehran. The only parties directly and immediately harmed by Obama’s policy of courting Iran are America’s allies in the Middle East. The Allies’ appeasement deal with the Nazis in 1938 had three victims: Czechoslovakia, the rest of Europe, and the rest of the world.

 

Obama’s policy of courting Iran also has three victims: Israel, the Sunni Arab states, and the rest of the world. Obama’s initiation of the six-power nuclear talks with Iran harms Israel because the talks facilitate Iran’s nuclear program. That is, Obama is enabling Iran to develop the means to attack Israel with nuclear weapons. According to press reports of the content of the negotiations, the US has already abandoned its major red lines. It has abandoned its demand that Iran dismantle its centrifuges. Late last week the US was reportedly about to abandon its demand for Iranian transparency to the International Atomic Energy Agency regarding its past work on atomic bomb development.  In other words, the deal the US was hoping to conclude this week with Iran, and will now continue negotiating next month, involves taking no serious action to curtail Iran’s progress in developing nuclear weapons. And in exchange for taking no action to curtail its nuclear progress, Iran demands and will likely receive a complete abrogation of binding UN Security Council economic sanctions against it. Those sanctions were passed in response to Iran’s illicit nuclear progress. The deal the US is now willing to sign renders Iran’s nuclear program legitimate.

 

Then there are the rest of the states in the region. The Saudis and their Sunni brethren are not the Czechs. They are Poland, Belgium France and Holland. Like the Nazis and the European states in late 1938, Iran threatens all Sunni states in the region. As the Americans have engaged in obsessive-compulsive nuclear negotiations with Iran, the Iranians have divided their attention between nuclear development and regional expansion. In September they took over Yemen. Houthi militia from northern Yemen took over Yemen’s capital city Sana’a that month. The Houthi are Shi’ite, and are to Yemen what Iran’s Lebanese Shi’ite proxy Hezbollah is to Lebanon. The Houthis, who are already a major force in the US-trained Yemeni armed forces, are demanding control over them.

 

In addition to its proxy’s takeover of Yemen, as Middle East analyst Tony Badran reported earlier this month, the Iranian leadership is orchestrating a major information campaign to present itself as the regional hegemon to regional actors. Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps Commander Qassem Soleimani has had his picture taken with Kurdish peshmerga in Iraq as well as with Iraqi regular military forces. Iranian security chief Ali Shamkhani went to Lebanon in late September and offered to arm the Lebanese Armed Forces. Iran, these photo-ops and visits signal – is the new boss of the region. Yemen shares a 1,700 km border with Saudi Arabia. The Houthis already fought a border war with Saudi Arabia in 2009. The Iranian proxy’s control over much of the border today is a clear threat to Saudi sovereignty. In light of the close ties the Houthis have spent the past decade cultivating with Saudi Arabia’s Shi’ite minority, it is also a threat to the internal political stability of the kingdom.

 

As the Obama administration has erased red line after red line in the nuclear talks, and sided with Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood and other Iranian Sunni allies against US allies, Iran’s leaders have gloated that their hegemony over Yemen raises to four the number of Arab states under their dominion, that list including Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. Iran’s control over Yemen is a direct threat to the world economy. Before the Houthis marched on Sana’a, Iran was able to threaten global oil markets with its sovereignty over the Straits of Hormuz that controls naval traffic between the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean. With the Port of Aden, Iran will also control maritime traffic between the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean. It is true that massive increases in US oil sales due to its shale oil development will reduce some of the Middle East’s power to dictate oil prices. But Middle Eastern oil sales still constitute 40 percent of the world market and will continue to be a massive force in the global economy in the coming years. As the force controlling the flow of that oil, Iran will exert massive influence over the global economy.

 

Add to that the fact that Iran’s Hezbollah has sleeper cells in every major city in Europe and in several hubs in North America, and that Iran has strategic alliances with Venezuela and Nicaragua, a nuclear- armed Iran exerting hegemonic control over the Middle East and its oil exports will become a strategic danger to the global economy and global security. One of the many eyebrow raising aspects of Obama’s courtship of Iran is that it isn’t tied to a US retreat from the region. The US isn’t retreating. Obama has ordered hundreds of air strikes on Islamic State targets to date, and more will undoubtedly follow. The US participated in the NATO overthrow of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. US power remains a major factor in regional affairs, and Obama has not shied away from using it during his tenure in office. The problem is that in all cases, his use of US power has helped Iran more than it has helped US allies. And in the case of Libya, US power has directly threatened US allies and empowered al-Qaida and it associates.

 

With the rise of China today, some US analysts question the wisdom of Nixon’s opening to Beijing. But there is little argument that his China gambit caused strategic damage to the Soviet Union and contributed to the US victory in the Cold War. Not only will Obama’s Iran opening not redound to the US’s benefit in the short term. Its inevitable result will be a decade or more of major and minor regional wars and chronic instability, with the nuclear-armed Iran threatening the survival of all of America’s regional allies. It will also lead to shocks in the global economy and massively expand Iran’s direct coercive power over the word as a whole. Not only is Obama no Nixon, compared to him, Neville Chamberlain looks like a minor, almost insignificant failure.

 

Contents           

 

On Topic

 

Sunni Political Islam: Engine of ‘Israeli-Palestinian’ Conflict: Jonathan Spyer, PJ Media, Nov. 22, 2014—An oft-repeated sentiment currently doing the rounds in discussions of the Israeli-Palestinian issue is that it is imperative that the conflict not become a “religious” one.

Battle of Jerusalem: What Congress Should Do Now: Seth Lipsky, New York Post, Nov. 19, 2014 —Let the massacre of the rabbis in Israel serve as a wake-up call to the new Congress that will be seated in Washington come January.

What To Do About Car Terrorism: Stephen M. Flatow, Jewish Press, Nov. 13, 2014 —As I prepare for an upcoming visit to Israel, I can’t help but feel a twinge of apprehension. How could it be otherwise?

The Accomplishment of Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, A Soldier of Allah: Paul Merkley, Bayview Review, Nov. 18, 2014 —Islam is becoming more dangerous for everybody every day.

The Temple Mount and Global Jihad: Ruthie Blum, Jerusalem Post, Nov. 9, 2014 —On Thursday, thousands of mourners attended the funeral of Border Police Superintendent Jadan Assad, from the Druse village of Beit Jann.

               

 

 

 

                      

                

                            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Contents:         

Visit CIJR’s Bi-Weekly Webzine: Israzine.

CIJR’s ISRANET Daily Briefing is available by e-mail.
Please urge colleagues, friends, and family to visit our website for more information on our ISRANET series.
To join our distribution list, or to unsubscribe, visit us at https://isranet.org/.

The ISRANET Daily Briefing is a service of CIJR. We hope that you find it useful and that you will support it and our pro-Israel educational work by forwarding a minimum $90.00 tax-deductible contribution [please send a cheque or VISA/MasterCard information to CIJR (see cover page for address)]. All donations include a membership-subscription to our respected quarterly ISRAFAX print magazine, which will be mailed to your home.

CIJR’s ISRANET Daily Briefing attempts to convey a wide variety of opinions on Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world for its readers’ educational and research purposes. Reprinted articles and documents express the opinions of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research.

 

 

Rob Coles, Publications Chairman, Canadian Institute for Jewish ResearchL'institut Canadien de recherches sur le Judaïsme, www.isranet.org

Tel: (514) 486-5544 – Fax:(514) 486-8284 ; ber@isranet.wpsitie.com

Donate CIJR

Become a CIJR Supporting Member!

Most Recent Articles

Day 5 of the War: Israel Internalizes the Horrors, and Knows Its Survival Is...

0
David Horovitz Times of Israel, Oct. 11, 2023 “The more credible assessments are that the regime in Iran, avowedly bent on Israel’s elimination, did not work...

Sukkah in the Skies with Diamonds

0
  Gershon Winkler Isranet.org, Oct. 14, 2022 “But my father, he was unconcerned that he and his sukkah could conceivably - at any moment - break loose...

Open Letter to the Students of Concordia re: CUTV

0
Abigail Hirsch AskAbigail Productions, Dec. 6, 2014 My name is Abigail Hirsch. I have been an active volunteer at CUTV (Concordia University Television) prior to its...

« Nous voulons faire de l’Ukraine un Israël européen »

0
12 juillet 2022 971 vues 3 https://www.jforum.fr/nous-voulons-faire-de-lukraine-un-israel-europeen.html La reconstruction de l’Ukraine doit également porter sur la numérisation des institutions étatiques. C’est ce qu’a déclaré le ministre...

Subscribe Now!

Subscribe now to receive the
free Daily Briefing by email

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Subscribe to the Daily Briefing

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.