Friday, March 29, 2024
Friday, March 29, 2024
Get the Daily
Briefing by Email

Subscribe

EUROPEANS INCREASINGLY CUT TIES WITH ISRAEL— WILL A ZIONISTFREI EUROPE BE THE OUTCOME?

We welcome your comments to this and any other CIJR publication. Please address your response to:  Rob Coles, Publications Chairman, Canadian Institute for Jewish Research, PO Box 175, Station  H, Montreal QC H3G 2K7 

 

Contents:

 

AS WE GO TO PRESS: SYDNEY CAFE SIEGE: STANDOFF OVER —Heavily armed Australian police stormed a central Sydney café where a self-proclaimed cleric was holding hostages at gunpoint, ending a siege lasting more than 16 hours. Two people were killed, along with the gunman, during two separate volleys of bullets, which followed loud explosions around 2:15 a.m. Tuesday and several people fleeing the Lindt Chocolate Café where the siege began Monday morning. The end to the standoff came around an hour after the gunman in the cafe was identified as Man Haron Monis, an Iranian refugee with a criminal record living in Sydney. Haron Monis’s website rails against perceived oppression by the U.S. and allies, including Australia, against Muslims. On the website, Haron Monis is described as a Sydney-based Muslim cleric unaffiliated with any organization or party. (Wall Street Journal, Dec. 15, 2014)

 

Rinsing Israel Out of Europe: The Zionistfrei Movement: Brendan O’Neill, Wall Street Journal, Dec. 9, 2014— In Nazi Germany, it was all the rage to make one’s town Judenfrei.

Irish Back Down in Face of Anger Over Decision Not to Mention Israel at Holocaust Ceremony: Sam Sokol, Jerusalem Post, Dec. 14, 2014— An Irish Holocaust memorial organization has reaffirmed that Israel will be mentioned during a January commemoration ceremony in Dublin, following widespread outrage over the revelation of guidelines proscribing the event’s master of ceremonies from referring to the Jewish state.

Europe is Becoming an Israel-Free Zone, Again: Giulio Meotti, Arutz Sheva, Dec. 8, 2014 — Leicester city council is controlled by Britain’s main opposition party, Labor. Leicester is also the UK’s 10th largest city.

The Jew of Nations: The Global Demonization of Israel: James Kirchick, World Affaris, Nov./Dec., 2014— Can there be any doubt that Israel is the most reviled country in the world today?

 

On Topic Links

 

Terror Has Come to Sydney: Justin Amler, Jerusalem Post, Dec. 15, 2014

Caroline Glick Tells off Danish Ambassador: Elder of Ziyon, Dec. 12, 2014

Israel Slams Ireland’s Vote to Support ‘Palestine’: Hana Levi Julian, Jewish Press, Dec. 11, 2014

Europeans Fund Anti-Israel Libels: Gerald M. Steinberg, Middle East Quarterly, Winter, 2015

A Sikh Principal, Too English for a Largely Muslim School: Kimiko de Freytas-Tamura, New York Times, Dec. 7, 2014

                                                                                        

         

RINSING ISRAEL OUT OF EUROPE: THE ZIONISTFREI MOVEMENT          

Brendan O’Neill                                                                                                 

Wall Street Journal, Dec. 9, 2014

 

In Nazi Germany, it was all the rage to make one’s town Judenfrei. Now a new fashion is sweeping Europe: to make one’s town or city what we might call “Zionistfrei”—free of the products and culture of the Jewish state. Across the Continent, cities and towns are declaring themselves “Israel-free zones,” insulating their citizens from Israeli produce and culture. It has ugly echoes of what happened 70 years ago.

 

Leicester City Council in England last month voted to boycott goods made in Israeli settlements in the West Bank. All services run by the council will be free of any product or technology made in any of the settlements. The motion “condemns the Government of Israel for its continuing illegal occupation of Palestine’s East Jerusalem and the West Bank” and resolves “to boycott any produce originating from illegal Israeli settlements.” Leicester Mayor Peter Soulsby insists that there’s nothing anti-Semitic about this erection of an Israel-deflecting force field around the city, telling the local Leicester Mercury newspaper that it’s simply about expressing dismay with “the behavior of the Israeli state.” But Jeffrey Kaufman, former president of Leicester’s Progressive Jewish Congregation, isn’t convinced. He wants to know why, “of all the horrible things going on in the world,” the council singled out Israel for punitive treatment. “It’s blatant anti-Semitism,” he said.

 

Other communities in Europe have gone further than Leicester. During this summer’s Gaza conflict, the town of Kinvara in western Ireland went completely Zionistfrei. Pro-Palestinian campaigners lobbied the town’s retailers, restaurants and cafes to expunge from their premises anything produced in Israel. All the businesses agreed, meaning Kinvara is now, in the eyes of anti-Israel agitators, morally pure. It is held up as a model town by numerous European backers of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, or BDS, movement. Also during the Gaza conflict, the mayor of Newry in Northern Ireland wrote to all the retailers of his district asking them to provide a list of the Israeli products they stock. He then asked them to remove these products from sale—he was backed by 21 votes to three on the Newry Council. Numerous Spanish provinces have this year been bombarded with requests to reject the “products, culture and sport” of the state of Israel. When BDS activists can’t get official backing for their desire to live Zionistfrei lives, they take things into their own hands. Three years ago in Montpellier, France, BDS activists spent an hour and a half rampaging through a shopping mall and “de-shelving” all the fruit produced in Israel. Under pressure from campaigners to break off all links with Israel, the French city of Lille in October ripped up its twinning accord with the Israeli city of Safed. Roger Cukierman, president of the Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions, was quoted in the French press saying Lille’s officials had shown a “heinous attitude toward the Israeli people.” In 2011, the council of West Dunbartonshire in Scotland voted to boycott all Israeli products and instructed all local libraries to stop stocking books printed in the state of Israel. Why not just burn them? Various towns in Turkey are shunning Coca-Cola over what they see as its support for Israel. Earlier this year, the mayor of Ordu in northern Turkey said “we boycott killer Israel and the global capital supporting it and do not drink its products,” as if anything made by Israel or its friends is some kind of poison liable to sully one’s body and soul.

 

The Zionistfrei movement isn’t really about effecting any change in the Middle East. As Leicester Councillor Mohammed Dawood admits, Israel is hardly going to be “trembling in its shoes” over the city’s boycott. Rather, the movement is about making the chattering classes in Europe feel pure and righteous, unsullied by the poisonousness of the state it’s now so fashionable to hate. Where yesteryear’s creators of Judenfrei zones saw the Jewish people as a corrupting presence, today’s lobbyists for Zionistfrei territories see the Jewish state as corrupting, as a toxic entity whose fruit and technology and books must be shunned. No, Jews aren’t being physically expelled from Europe, but they are being made to feel unwelcome. Given that most Jews feel affinity with the state of Israel, what must they think when they see parts of Europe being cleansed of all things Israeli? They must think: “My culture and my people are not wanted here.” And European Jews are voting with their feet. In the first eight months of this year, 4,566 Jews left France for Israel, more than the total number that left in 2013 (3,228). Last year a European Union survey found that 29% of Europe’s Jews had considered emigrating because they no longer feel safe. BDS is one of the ugliest political movements of our time. It is shot through with double standards, treating Israel as more wicked than any other state. It is shrill and censorious, too. Its members boo and jeer and seek to expel from apparently civilized Europe not only Israeli military leaders and politicians but even Israeli violinists and actors. Now, the demand for Zionistfrei zones is taking BDS to its terrifying conclusion, that Israel and everyone associated with it (you know who) should be shunned by respectable communities everywhere.

                                                                        Contents                                                                  

                  

   

                  

IRISH BACK DOWN IN FACE OF ANGER OVER DECISION

NOT TO MENTION ISRAEL AT HOLOCAUST CEREMONY

Sam Sokol                                                                                                            

Jerusalem Post, Dec. 14, 2014 

 

An Irish Holocaust memorial organization has reaffirmed that Israel will be mentioned during a January commemoration ceremony in Dublin, following widespread outrage over the revelation of guidelines proscribing the event’s master of ceremonies from referring to the Jewish state. In an October 7 letter that was subsequently obtained and published by the Israellycool website, Holocaust Education Trust Ireland (HETI) board chairman Peter Cassells stated that “it was decided in future, the MC of Holocaust Memorial Day will not refer to the Jewish state or the State of Israel during any part of the ceremony.” Yanky Fachler, the longtime host of the event, to whom the letter was addressed, was recently informed that he was being terminated and that a new MC was to be retained. Speaking with The Jewish Chronicle, Fachler stated that he had been given similar instructions prior to this year’s ceremony as well.

 

Such a decision “plays directly into the hands of everyone who doesn’t like Jews or Israel, and I find it very sad that apparently the two Jewish members of the board did this,” he said. Alan Shatter, the Jewish former Irish justice and equality minister, came out strongly against both Fachler’s firing and the decision to place a moratorium on references to Israel. He told Cassells, in a letter quoted by the British newspaper, his decision was “completely unacceptable” and aired his concern that “board members of HETI have been influenced in how they’re approaching this issue by the hostility towards Israel in some sections of Irish public discourse and by the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.” Jewish organizations were quick to pounce on Cassells and HETI, accusing the organization of playing politics with the memories of those murdered in the Holocaust.

 

Decoupling Israel and the Holocaust reflect “abysmal ignorance of the critical importance of the existence of the State of Israel, the lethal consequences for Jews that it did not exist during the Nazi era and Israel’s vital role in absorbing Holocaust survivors and providing them with a secure home after the Shoah,” the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Efraim Zuroff, a professional Nazi hunter, told The Jerusalem Post. According to Zuroff, a “deep-seated and grossly unfair hatred of Israel” has to a large extent replaced “traditional anti-Semitism” in Ireland and throughout the European continent. This trend, he asserted, has led to an “extremely worrying tendency to focus exclusively on dead Jews, while purposely ignoring the ongoing threats to their descendants, which stem from the very same anti-Semitism which led to the Holocaust.” A similar message was delivered to Irish President Michael Higgins in a letter by the center’s Shimon Samuels, who warned that to exclude Israel from the memorial ceremony “is tantamount to Holocaust obfuscation and revisionism.”

 

Stephan Kramer, who stepped down as the secretary-general of the Central Council of Jews in Germany in January and now heads the American Jewish Committee’s European Office on Anti-Semitism, was even harsher in his condemnations. “Turning Israel into something you are not supposed to mention, and concentration on the ‘good Jews,’ i.e., dead Jews, is an insult to the memory of Holocaust victims as well as to the entire Jewish people,” he charged. “How can you ignore the fact that the absence of a Jewish state at that time – combined with the cold-hearted refusal of Mandatory Britain to let persecuted Jews enter Israel – magnified, in the final result, the number of Jews murdered by the Nazis? How can you ignore the fact that Israel is considered by most Jews in the world a guarantee that there will be no second genocide? How can you ignore the fact that the central Holocaust commemoration site – Yad Vashem – is in Israel?” he asked, calling on HETI to cancel the event rather than turn it into something anti-Semitic.

 

Charles Srebnik is a Holocaust survivor from Belgium now living in New York, who emailed to the Post by way of the Holocaust Survivors Foundation-USA to register his anger over HETI’s decision. “Hitler was able to murder my family and 6 million other Jews because no other country would take us in…. To exclude Israel from a Holocaust commemoration is to deny this truth, to deny history. It is a crime against the 6 million Jews who were murdered and those of us who survived,” he said. In response to the public outcry, Cassells issued a press release backtracking on the policy and stating that he had “reassured the Jewish community in Ireland that Israel will be referred to in Holocaust Memorial Day commemorations.” Cassells confirmed that Israeli Ambassador Boaz Moda’i would be present at the event. Speaking with the Post on Sunday, the chairman of the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland, Maurice Cohen, denied having received any such assurances from Cassells, despite having written to him directly over two weeks ago regarding the matter. He stated that HETI had placed a small item in a local newsletter addressing the issue, but nobody at his organization, which represents Ireland’s tiny community of perhaps 2,000 Jews, had been contacted directly.

 

It is hard to understand what motivated Cassells’s decision to ban the MC from mentioning Israel, Cohen said, adding that he is still waiting for clarification of the matter, and that in the meantime he is still planning on attending the commemoration. However, he threatened, “if I don’t get an answer probably by close of business tomorrow or first thing Tuesday morning, I will probably publish my letter to them openly.” “It is possible that if the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland don’t get a satisfactory response to the letter, they will be considering asking for those trustees that were involved in this decision to resign from the board of HETI,” he warned. While condemning HETI’s decision, the Yad Vashem-Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’ Remembrance Authority expressed cautious optimism over the organization’s decision to backtrack. “The idea of preventing mention of the State of Israel at a ceremony commemorating the victims of the Holocaust, as had been reported in the media, is outrageous, and we are pleased to note the HETI statement that the Israeli ambassador will be speaking at the event,” said Estee Yaari, a spokeswoman for the authority.                                           

 

                                                                       

Contents                  

                                                                                  

                   

EUROPE IS BECOMING AN ISRAEL-FREE ZONE, AGAIN                                

Giulio Meotti

Arutz Sheva, Dec. 8, 2014

 

Leicester city council is controlled by Britain’s main opposition party, Labor. Leicester is also the UK’s 10th largest city. That is why what happened there a few days ago will have serious consequences all over England and Europe. Leicester just became in fact the first Western city to ban Israeli goods from its territory and jurisdiction. Even the Nazis, in their initial boycott of Jews, didn't go so far as to cleanse a city of any Jewish goods. A couple of years ago, a provincial council near Glasgow, West Dunbartonshire, banned Israeli books from local libraries. Recently, MP George Galloway has called for the British city of Bradford to become an "Israel-free zone".

 

Meanwhile, the Jordan Valley's "settlements" are not selling any more to Western Europe. Sales of peppers and grapes to Western Europe from there have dropped by about 50 percent and fresh herbs by about 40 percent. Marks & Spencer in the UK hasn't sold any products from Judea and Samaria since 2007. Supermarket chain Waitrose stopped selling herbs from the Jordan Valley several years ago. Morrisons, Britain's fourth-largest grocer, stopped selling Israel's dates in 2011. The German Kaiser's supermarket stopped carrying products from Judea, Samaria and the Golan Heights in 2012. All over Europe, universities are promoting the boycott of Israeli professors. In Spain, a governmental academic program excluded the Israeli academics from Ariel University in Samaria. It happened in the socialist, modern Spain, not during the Spanish Inquisition.

 

It doesn't stop there. That is only a cover up for the rest. There are many European areas in the bigger cities where you cannot go outside looking like a Jew. It is the rule, not the exception. Jews are safer sporting a kippa on the roads of Hawara, near Nablus, than in the outskirts of Paris. This is Europe: while it is becoming an Israel-free zone, it is trying to divide up the land of Israel, to squeeze the Jews into the coastal ghetto and to finally build a Jüdenrein Middle East. In fact, on October 30, Sweden's government became the first Western European nation in Europe to recognize the "Palestinian State". Since then, lawmakers in Britain, Spain and Ireland have approved motions urging recognition, while French legislators are scheduled to debate a similar measure in the next few days. We can compare these moves to the miserable Leicester decision. It happened before, in 1973. This was the message then: "If you Europeans help us to crush Israel, we Arabs will give you the fuel you need for your industries and for warming your homes". And promptly, those European governments were quick to say yes to the Arab blackmailers, with no apparent sign of shame or resentment.

 

Given the unquestioning surrender of Europeans, Arabs always ask a lot and gain a lot.  Always defeated by the Israelis and feeling unable to win on the battlefield, the Arabs are now aiming to buy the complicity of a continent, my Europe, which increasingly shows signs of selfish and cowardly senility. Hitler was also skillful in using this method. Before annexing territories to the Germans, Hitler worked with delirious passion to convince people that this was his last request, the end of the line. When he meditated taking over Czechoslovakia and threatened war, Hitler had a few talks with British and French Prime Ministers in Monaco. Chamberlain once said, "There is one point on which I would like to be clear: you say that three million Sudeten must be annexed to the Reich. And then I would like to ask a question: will this fully satisfy you?". The next day, September 16, 1938, Chamberlain returned to London, rejoined the Cabinet, and advised England to give in to Hitler taking account of his promises for the future. Chamberlain added, "Everything now depends on the word of Hitler. Can we trust him? After my personal contact, I think so: it seems to me that Hitler is under the category of men on whose word you can count".  All of Europe paid for this. Today in Europe we are witnessing the same level of blind stupidity and anti-Semitic complacency in policy towards the Palestinian Arabs. 1938, 1973, 2014: it is time again for Europe's betrayal of the Jewish people.   

                                                                                   

Contents                                     

                                                              

         

THE JEW OF NATIONS: THE GLOBAL DEMONIZATION OF ISRAEL           

James Kirchick

World Affairs, Nov./Dec., 2014

 

Can there be any doubt that Israel is the most reviled country in the world today? No other nation engenders as much scorn, whether measured in newspaper column inches, street protests, or computer pixels. The only aspect of the hatred more disturbing than its virulent omnipresence is how out of proportion it is to Israel’s real (and alleged) wrongdoing. North Korea functions as a vast gulag, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad deploys chemical weapons on children, and the Castro brothers have ruled despotically over their Cuban island fiefdom for five decades running, but none of these dictatorial regimes invite anywhere near the scrutiny, never mind spittle-flecked loathing, engendered by the Jewish democratic state. A majority of Europeans, according to polls, consider this tiny country of eight million people to be the greatest threat to world peace. An Israeli soldier fires a rubber bullet in the West Bank and it will generate venomous crowds in cities around the globe; Iranian paramilitary basij forces murder peaceful demonstrators in broad daylight and the world emits barely a peep of protest.

 

Why the Jewish state generates such disproportionate anger is the subject of Joshua Muravchik’s thorough and careful study, Making David into Goliath: How the World Turned Against Israel. The easy answer is anti-Semitism, and while hatred of Jews certainly does factor in generating hostility to Israel, this cannot be the only explanation. We know this because Israel, ever since its founding in 1948, has been a Jewish state, and yet its status as the world’s polecat was not earned until decades later. Muravchik’s answer to the question is multifaceted, and he devotes a chapter each to several elements which, he contends, have contributed to Israel’s unenviable position, from the “Power of Oil” utilized by the Arab states as a weapon of political blackmail, to the volte-face of the Socialist International, the worldwide association of center-left political parties that once stood foursquare behind the Jewish state.

 

Much of the reason for the shift in world attitudes can be attributed to a basic change in the optics of the Middle East conflict. When Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948, it did so as a nascent nation of Holocaust survivors and steely agrarian pioneers, surrounded by hostile Arab armies intent on finishing what the Nazis had started. In these circumstances, it is not difficult to understand why Israel earned the admiration of so many people around the world during the first years of its precarious existence, among Americans—many of whom, as Christians, felt a religious obligation to support the return of Jewish sovereignty in the Holy Land—in particular. Israel accepted the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine, which would have divided the British Mandate territory between Arabs and Jews and placed Jerusalem under a form of international trusteeship. The Arabs rejected it, choosing war over compromise. When Israel won that war, it also won the admiration of much of the (non-Arab and non-Muslim) world. Here was a plucky little nation, a young democracy, defending itself against annihilationist aggression. Facing such challenges, the Israel of the middle twentieth century was easily identifiable as David battling for its very survival against the Arab Goliath.

 

The narrative, however, began to change following the Six-Day War of 1967. In the midst of defending itself against yet another Arab attempt to destroy it, Israel came into possession of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, territories that had, up until that time, been illegally occupied by Jordan and Egypt, respectively. Both parcels of land were populated with Arabs, many of whom had fled from Mandate Palestine—either on their own volition or because they were driven from their homes by Israeli troops—in 1948. Now, the conflict could be reframed not as that of little Israel against the vast Arab world, but rather, between mighty Israel and the occupied, stateless Palestinians (who had only recently begun to embrace a distinct “Palestinian,” as opposed to Arab, national identity). In shorthand, Israel’s struggle to exist alongside its neighbors in peace went from being known as the Arab-Israeli conflict (in which it was undeniably David) to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (in which its enemies could claim that it was actually Goliath). No longer was the saga of Israel one of a long-stateless people returning to their national home and defending it against the legions of the Arab world. “Instead of proclaiming openly their determination to deny the Jews a state,” Muravchik writes, “Israel’s enemies now accused the Jews of denying that same right to another people, the Palestinians.” Ruling over an occupied population, Israel and its sympathizers would have more difficulty portraying it as the underdog. This is the major reasons that the international left, which (at least theoretically) loves underdogs, turned on Israel.

 

Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union had initially backed the Yishuv, as the pre-statehood Jewish community in Palestine was known, which it saw as a beachhead of socialism and a worthy irritant to its new Cold War adversary, Great Britain. But soon after Israel’s War of Independence, Moscow’s strategic calculation changed as the Jews outlived their usefulness as enemies of London. The Soviets now made a play for the sympathies of the Arab world. Suddenly, Moscow had gone from being the savior of the Jewish state (it was a last-minute arms shipment from Czechoslovakia, authorized by Stalin, that had rescued Israel in 1948) to the world headquarters of “anti-Zionist” (often barely disguised anti-Semitic) propaganda. Moscow’s decision to back the Arabs against Israel provided a foretaste of what was to come from the global left. The story of the world’s turning against Israel is largely the story of the left turning against Israel, and few are better equipped to tell that sad and disgraceful tale than Muravchik…

[To Read the Full Article Click the Following Link—Ed.]

 

 

 

Contents           

 

On Topic

 

Terror Has Come to Sydney: Justin Amler, Jerusalem Post, Dec. 15, 2014—Night has fallen upon the streets of Sydney, and a quiet unease has filled the air.

Caroline Glick Tells off Danish Ambassador (Video): Elder of Ziyon, Dec. 12, 2014

Israel Slams Ireland’s Vote to Support ‘Palestine’: Hana Levi Julian, Jewish Press, Dec. 11, 2014—Israel’s Foreign Ministry accused the Irish parliament Thursday of “statements of hatred and anti-Semitism directed at Israel in a way which we have not heard before.”

Europeans Fund Anti-Israel Libels: Gerald M. Steinberg, Middle East Quarterly, Winter, 2015 —In May 2014, Zochrot—a radical Israeli nongovernmental organization (NGO)—was the focus of widespread mainstream media coverage featuring its iNakba mobile application (app).

A Sikh Principal, Too English for a Largely Muslim School: Kimiko de Freytas-Tamura, New York Times, Dec. 7, 2014 —As a Sikh and second-generation Briton running a public school made up mostly of Muslim students, Balwant Bains was at the center of the issues facing multicultural Britain, including the perennial question of balancing religious precepts and cultural identity against assimilation.

 

           

 

 

 

 

               

 

 

 

                      

                

                            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Contents:         

Visit CIJR’s Bi-Weekly Webzine: Israzine.

CIJR’s ISRANET Daily Briefing is available by e-mail.
Please urge colleagues, friends, and family to visit our website for more information on our ISRANET series.
To join our distribution list, or to unsubscribe, visit us at https://isranet.org/.

The ISRANET Daily Briefing is a service of CIJR. We hope that you find it useful and that you will support it and our pro-Israel educational work by forwarding a minimum $90.00 tax-deductible contribution [please send a cheque or VISA/MasterCard information to CIJR (see cover page for address)]. All donations include a membership-subscription to our respected quarterly ISRAFAX print magazine, which will be mailed to your home.

CIJR’s ISRANET Daily Briefing attempts to convey a wide variety of opinions on Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world for its readers’ educational and research purposes. Reprinted articles and documents express the opinions of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research.

 

 

Rob Coles, Publications Chairman, Canadian Institute for Jewish ResearchL'institut Canadien de recherches sur le Judaïsme, www.isranet.org

Tel: (514) 486-5544 – Fax:(514) 486-8284 ; ber@isranet.wpsitie.com

Donate CIJR

Become a CIJR Supporting Member!

Most Recent Articles

Day 5 of the War: Israel Internalizes the Horrors, and Knows Its Survival Is...

0
David Horovitz Times of Israel, Oct. 11, 2023 “The more credible assessments are that the regime in Iran, avowedly bent on Israel’s elimination, did not work...

Sukkah in the Skies with Diamonds

0
  Gershon Winkler Isranet.org, Oct. 14, 2022 “But my father, he was unconcerned that he and his sukkah could conceivably - at any moment - break loose...

Open Letter to the Students of Concordia re: CUTV

0
Abigail Hirsch AskAbigail Productions, Dec. 6, 2014 My name is Abigail Hirsch. I have been an active volunteer at CUTV (Concordia University Television) prior to its...

« Nous voulons faire de l’Ukraine un Israël européen »

0
12 juillet 2022 971 vues 3 https://www.jforum.fr/nous-voulons-faire-de-lukraine-un-israel-europeen.html La reconstruction de l’Ukraine doit également porter sur la numérisation des institutions étatiques. C’est ce qu’a déclaré le ministre...

Subscribe Now!

Subscribe now to receive the
free Daily Briefing by email

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Subscribe to the Daily Briefing

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.